2. If the answer to the last question was in the affirmative, whether by the combined action of 63764 Vic: C.44, the said Proclamation and section 8 Customs Act 1879 (42+43 Vict. C. 21), the revolvers and ammunition were forfeited to His Majesty, and, being forfeited, liable to be seized in His Majesty's dominions?
Whether any part of they were ever liable to seizure under the law of Hong-Kong?
OFFICERS
419
We have taken the papers into our consideration, and, in obedience to your commands, have the honour to Report:
1. That Wei-hai-wei is, in our opinion, to be regarded as being in "China" within the meaning of the Proclamation of 7th August 1900.
We understand that His Majesty's Government have not exercised their right of treating Wei-hai-wei otherwise.
4. What course should be taken with reference to the arms?
5. Generally.
We are of opinion that if this ever were His Majesty's dominions, but even so would occasion no difficulty.
"China"
:
:
2. If the answer to the last question
was in the affirmative, whether by the
combined action
of
63764 Vic: C.44,
the
of
the
said Proclamation and section 8
Customs Act 1879 (42+43 Vict. C. 21), the
revolvers and ammunition were
forfeited
to His Majesty, and, being forfeited,
liable to be seized in
Majesty's dominions?
بي
Hi's
were
any part of
Whether
they
evere
liable to
scizure under the law of Hong-Kong
OFFICERS
419
We have taken the papers
our consideration, and, in obedience
your commands,
into
to
mands, have the honour
to
Report
1.
That Wei-hai-wei is, in
opinion, to be
regarded
مه
being in
the
"China" within the meaning of
Proclamation
of 7th August 1900.
We understand that His Majesty's
Government have not exercised their
or otherwise.
4.
What
Course
should be taken
right of threating Wein hai wai
0.0
spart
with reference to the arius??
5. Generally."
We
of
if this
evere
His Majesty's dominions, but even
40
would occasion.
we do not think it
any difficulty
"China"
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.